Decision Support Comes of Age: From Guidance to Design

Decision Support Comes of Age: From Guidance to Design

In our previous piece, we explored how CIRO’s updated guidance on Order Execution Only (OEO) accounts, expected in early 2026, reflects a broader reality. Self-directed investors are already seeking guidance from a growing list of sources, and Canadian regulators are now acknowledging that support can exist without crossing into recommendation. It’s now up to the platforms serving these investors to create experiences that drive insight, decisions, alignment, and retention.

This requires more than adding new tools. It demands a rethink of how guidance shows up across the investor journey, how context is preserved, and how support can remain informative without becoming prescriptive. Today, we’ll step through some of the specific capabilities that can support this shift – and how they can combine to support self-directed investors as they make high-stakes decisions.

Building Blocks for a Better Supported User Journey

Decision support doesn’t mean telling investors what to do. Instead, platforms should surface context, illuminate trade-offs, and help users understand consequences – in the flow of real decisions. The capabilities below represent practical, compliant ways to do that.

• Portfolio monitoring and assistance

Keep investors oriented between trades. Ongoing diagnostics and alerts help users understand how their portfolio is evolving – flagging shifts in volatility, concentration, or allocation drift, and prompting review when something meaningfully changes. Done well, this is less about pushing action than preventing blind spots, with neutral language that highlights what changed and why it matters.

• Sample portfolios

Give investors reference points, not directives. Illustrative portfolios aligned to a user’s stated objective or risk posture can frame diversification and trade-offs in a tangible way – especially for newer investors who may benefit from seeing what a balanced approach looks like. The key is positioning these as educational starting points, not endorsements of a specific allocation or product.

• Advanced research and screening

Let users explore their options on their own terms. Interactive screeners enable investors to define criteria – sector, valuation, yield, volatility, fundamentals – and then explore results with clear explanations of why each security surfaced. That’s decision support because it replaces opaque “picks” with user-driven discovery and visible methodology.

• Pre-trade intelligence

Give users context before they hit that button. Before execution, platforms can surface risk characteristics, historical ranges, scenario-style “what if” views, and cost/friction indicators that help investors understand what they’re about to do. The value here is simple: better decisions happen when implications are visible before the click, not just after.

• Risk modeling and questionnaires

Translate self-assessment into usable context. Structured questionnaires can turn vague preferences into an understandable risk profile that informs how information is framed across the experience. This supports decision-making by creating a defensible baseline for alerts, education and planning tools, without dictating what the investor should buy or sell.

• Planning tools (savings, tax, goals)

Connect trades to outcomes investors actually care about. Lightweight goal planning tools help users see how contributions, time horizon, and risk interact, so investing decisions don’t live in a vacuum. Here, the decision support comes from clarifying trade-offs: what changes if you contribute more, invest differently, or take on more risk, presented as scenarios rather than promises.

• Investment and trade construction

Make complex actions understandable. Guided workflows can help investors build positions – especially multi-leg trades – by clarifying mechanics, payoffs, and risk/reward in plain terms. The result is a reduction in accidental complexity: users can implement their intent while understanding consequences, without being steered toward a specific outcome.

• Tutorials, education, and gamification

Integrate education into the decision flow. Embedded, decision-triggered education (short explainers, tooltips, checklists, simulations) builds confidence when users are about to act. The goal isn’t to encourage trading, but to encourage comprehension, so investors learn while they decide, and the platform supports literacy without crossing into advice.

Decision Support in Practice: An Always-On Guidance Model

Imagine a self-directed platform that treats guidance less like a set of tools and more like a design system – a consistent way of showing up for investors across every step of the journey. The user remains in control, but the experience is built so they rarely hit that familiar wall: “Now what?”

• Guidance is ambient. Instead of pushing users to a separate education hub or help center, the platform keeps a steady, visible “guidance layer” in the experience – clear language, lightweight prompts, and timely cues that make the next step legible without steering toward a specific outcome.
  
  
• Support responds to intent, not confusion. The platform doesn’t wait for investors to get stuck. It anticipates common decision points and introduces optional nudges and context as the user moves – the kind of help that feels like good product design, not just “advice.”
  
  
• Value comes before commitment. Early experiences are structured to let users feel supported quickly – an inviting starting point, clear “next” options, and constraints that encourage exploration without pressure. The tone stays helpful and transparent rather than sales-driven.
  
  
• Continuity matters more than channels. When a decision crosses a complexity threshold, there’s an easy path to human support – and if a user drops off, follow-ups reflect what they actually tried. The result is a single guidance voice across product, people, and post-session prompts, rather than disconnected touchpoints. 

The important point is that this model doesn’t “recommend.” It reduces uncertainty – by keeping guidance present, timely, and optional – so investors can act with clearer understanding and fewer blind spots.

Conclusion: The New, Regulated Standard for Self-Directed

CIRO’s updated OEO guidance doesn’t mean self-directed platforms need to become advisors. It asks them to do something harder: design experiences that help investors interpret decisions in real time, without endorsing a specific outcome. The capabilities in this piece are the building blocks. The differentiator is how consistently they’re delivered: in context, in plain language, and with continuity across digital and human support.

Platforms that execute this well won’t just stay compliant – they’ll earn deeper engagement and longer-term trust.

‍